Expanding Horizons: Lauren Eggert’s Mission to Transform Pulmonary Care in the East Bay

Expanding Horizons: Lauren Eggert’s Mission to Transform Pulmonary Care in the East Bay

#Interventions

Lauren Eggert, MD, who is working to expand the reach of Stanford’s chest clinic, to reach pulmonary patients throughout the East Bay

Stanford Medicine has grown substantially since 2017, but there still aren’t nearly enough experts and clinics to get patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma the care they need. 

Lauren Eggert, MD, had no specific fascination with pulmonary medicine in medical school until she started working with a mentor during her internal medicine residency. That mentor, she says, was a “fantastic clinician in the intensive care unit (ICU) and pulmonary clinic,” adding, “I wanted to be just like them.” 

Eggert joined Stanford Medicine’s Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine as a fellow in 2017 to follow in her mentor’s footsteps. She’s now a clinical assistant professor of pulmonary, allergy, and critical care medicine.

“A lot of patients of mine come all the way from San Luis Obispo, from Nevada, from Sacramento, from far out in the Central Valley,” she says.

“Finding alternative sites where we can have more space, have more providers, and also reach different communities has been an important goal of the chest clinic and pulmonary at Stanford.”

Resources and Clinical Trials for Asthma

“One of the things we are working on is building a stronger asthma program through the multidisciplinary allergy clinic,” says Eggert. One day a week, Eggert works at the allergy clinic to help patients with allergic asthma. The clinic has access to advanced tools such as fractional excretion of nitric oxide, which helps clinicians measure lung inflammation. The team schedules monthly meetings to discuss how to improve the care of complex patients.

She’s also teamed up with researchers at the Asian American Research Center at Stanford to study asthma, allergies, and other pulmonary conditions in Asian populations.

“We’ve published work on the importance of disaggregating Asian subgroups. For example, outcomes can be different between people who are Chinese and those who are Filipino.”

One of Eggert’s most recent studies showed that Filipino Americans get less sleep and have more difficulty falling asleep than other Asian Americans, which she points out could influence many other health outcomes. 

Additionally, the chest clinic is planning to open an outreach clinic in Oakland’s Chinatown, with the future addition of allergists on staff to better support the needs of patients who live there. Several of the newest treatments for asthma and COPD are injections that require patients to visit the clinic. “We’re trying to build ways to get care into their neighborhoods, so they don’t have to come to Palo Alto from the East Bay, which is quite a hardship,” Eggert says.

"

“Finding alternative sites where we can have more space, have more providers, and also reach different communities has been an important goal of the chest clinic and pulmonary at Stanford.”

– Lauren Eggert, MD

Keeping COPD Patients Out of the Hospital

Eggert is working on increasing access to pulmonary rehabilitation – an eight- to 12-week program that combines education, breathing exercises, endurance exercises, strength work, and more – that is well-known to improve quality of life for people with COPD and other lung conditions. It also helps keep patients out of the hospital. “It’s just being grossly underutilized, and one of the biggest factors is lack of access,” says Eggert. 

Only about 5% of patients who could benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation use it. In rural areas, that number is even lower. It’s closer to 3% of patients who are likely to benefit. Stanford Medicine is partnering with an innovative virtual rehabilitation program to allow patients to work through the program without having to travel. 

Eggert, her team, and her collaborators throughout Stanford Medicine are reaching new frontiers, building new spaces, making the most of telehealth technologies, and providing better care for more pulmonary patients than ever before.

Cutting-Edge Science Delivers Insights Into the Inner Workings of Autoimmune Diseases

Cutting-Edge Science Delivers Insights Into the Inner Workings of Autoimmune Diseases

#Methods

Suzanne Tamang, PhD; PJ Utz, MD; and Titilola Falasinnu, PhD

Autoimmune and rheumatic diseases can impact anyone, often affecting individuals in the prime of their lives—during their 20s, 30s, and 40s. The consequences not only are personal, as these conditions can disable the most active members of our society, but also have profound societal impacts. Families are burdened, and economic productivity is lost. Despite this significant impact, these diseases remain some of the most misunderstood and neglected areas in medicine.

“The challenges we face in understanding and managing autoimmune and rheumatic diseases are substantial. Yet, they are not insurmountable,” says Bill Robinson, MD, PhD, professor and division chief of immunology and rheumatology. “With the convergence of computational power and biomedical expertise, we are now poised to unravel these complexities.”

In the Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, three pioneering researchers – Suzanne Tamang, PhD, PJ Utz, MD, and Titilola Falasinnu, PhD – are at the forefront of an exciting scientific frontier. They are using cutting-edge computational and informatics techniques to redefine our understanding and management of autoimmune and rheumatic diseases. 

“Better understanding the mechanisms underlying autoimmune rheumatic diseases will provide insights that will lead to the development of next-generation therapeutics with the potential to provide more effective and fundamental treatment, thereby enabling people with autoimmune diseases to live healthy, productive, and vibrant lives,” Robinson says.

Synthetic Patients Help Uncover Environmental Impacts on Autoimmune Diseases

Assistant Professor Suzanne Tamang, PhD, is unleashing the latest in AI technologies with a rich and vast veteran database to better understand the effects of environmental factors such as air pollution on autoimmune disorders and rheumatic diseases.

Through her work with the Department of Veterans Affairs medical database, Tamang has developed a natural language processing system that analyzes over a million patient notes daily, extracting important risk factors previously locked up in unstructured text. This information helps the VA better address the complex needs of veterans nationwide. 

Tamang is also creating “synthetic populations” with her collaborators at the start-up MDClone to enable new studies on the environmental triggers of autoimmune disorders and rheumatic diseases like rheumatoid arthritis. By anonymizing real patient data and linking it to environmental exposures, Tamang aims to understand disease flares and improve patient outcomes.

“They are synthetic patients,” Tamang says of the AI-created population. “It was derived from real veterans, although it’s synthetic. It’s a new method, based on generative AI, and it allows us to bring in environmental data to explore different ways to link it to population health.”

Professor Suzanne Tamang, PhD, applies cutting-edge AI to veteran data to uncover how environmental factors like air pollution affect autoimmune and rheumatic diseases.

“‘They are synthetic patients,’ Suzanne Tamang, PhD, says of the AI-created population. ‘It was derived from real veterans, although it’s synthetic. It’s a new method, based on generative AI, and it allows us to bring in environmental data to explore different ways to link it to population health.’”

Tamang’s population health approach considers how the interplay of clinical, social, and environmental factors influences health outcomes. Her research using air pollution data from the U.S. could help clinicians mitigate flares caused by factors like wildfire smoke. 

The synthetic population, encompassing a diverse range of demographics and geographic locations across the U.S., not only enhances the generalizability of her findings but also maintains patient privacy. This innovative method supports the development of predictive models that could significantly improve healthcare responses to environmental triggers.

Tamang’s work advances autoimmune research by translating complex AI technologies into practical tools that improve access to quality health care for vulnerable populations. Her pioneering efforts aim to empower health systems with data to better anticipate and mitigate the impacts of environmental factors on health outcomes.

“Our work aims to unite various experts to tackle these significant challenges by providing them with comprehensive datasets,” she says. “This approach marks a critical advancement in our ongoing projects within the new climate and health space.”

"

Massive Scale of COVID-19 Unlocks New Insights Into Autoimmune Responses

In a significant shift in understanding autoimmune diseases, PJ Utz, MD, professor of immunology and rheumatology, leads Stanford’s research efforts to leverage the unprecedented scale of COVID-19 to reveal how the virus may initiate long-term autoimmune processes.

Utz and his team are using advanced technology to study thousands of proteins at once, helping them understand the complex immune system issues in long COVID-19. Their research has found that some COVID-19 patients develop autoantibodies, which are proteins that mistakenly attack the body. This supports the idea that the virus can trigger autoimmune diseases. These findings, driven by the widespread effects of the pandemic, are leading doctors to rethink how they approach the treatment and understanding of infectious diseases and autoimmunity.

Leading a groundbreaking exploration of post-viral autoimmunity, PJ Utz, MD, harnesses the massive scale of COVID-19 to unravel hidden complexities of the autoimmune response.

“We have such a unique opportunity here with this pandemic that I’ll spend the rest of my career studying how COVID-19 triggers autoimmunity and how we can treat it.”

– PJ Utz, MD

When the pandemic began, Stanford and other institutions proactively started to collect samples, enroll patients, and study the disease as it evolved. 

“We were essentially building the new immunological frontier while the airplane was being built,” Utz explains. This proactive approach has allowed researchers to capture unprecedented data on the immune responses triggered by COVID-19.

Building on the knowledge gained from past pandemics, today’s researchers, equipped with unparalleled clinical samples and molecular tools, are now able to conduct detailed studies of viral effects on the immune system and advance theories about post-viral autoimmune effects that were previously speculative.

“We have such a unique opportunity here with this pandemic,” Utz says, “that I’ll spend the rest of my career studying how COVID-19 triggers autoimmunity and how we can treat it.”

"

New Research Offers Solutions and Hope for People With Chronic Pain

Motivated by helping individuals with chronic pain, Titilola Falasinnu, PhD, assistant professor of immunology and rheumatology, is dedicated to developing innovative methods to alleviate the suffering of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Her work aims to enhance daily living and improve quality of life by addressing pain that often impairs everyday activities.

Despite treatment advances in rheumatology, pain remains the most prominent, unaddressed patient complaint. Depending on the diagnosis, upwards of 65% of patients are on long-term opioid therapies and have higher rates of opioid overdose hospitalizations than the general population, Falasinnu says.

“Given these significant burdens, there is a critical need for innovative research to develop better pain management strategies and improve patient outcomes,” she says. “It is imperative to study pain not just as a symptom but as a disease in its own right to understand its impact better and develop effective treatments.”

Dedicated to reducing opioid dependence and enhancing the quality of life for people with autoimmune diseases, Titilola Falasinnu’s research paves the way for personalized treatments that address both biological and psychosocial factors.

“Our research not only advances our understanding of chronic pain and autoimmune diseases but also transforms patient care through personalized medicine and predictive modeling, shaping future public health strategies.”

– Titilola Falasinnu, PhD

The Falasinnu Lab is composed of epidemiologists, clinicians, pain scientists, and informaticists who use large datasets and advanced computational methods to understand the complex nature of pain in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, such as lupus. They are developing predictive models to forecast pain episodes in patients to enable personalized medicine and treatment plans. 

Their research has illuminated overlapping factors that influence chronic pain, paving the way for interventions that address both biological and psychosocial aspects of pain management. The aim is to improve patient quality of life and reduce reliance on long-term opioid therapies, which carry significant health risks.

“Our research not only advances our understanding of chronic pain and autoimmune diseases but also transforms patient care through personalized medicine and predictive modeling, shaping future public health strategies,” she says.

The Data Driver: How Tina Hernandez-Boussard Is Shaping Inclusive Health Care

The Data Driver: How Tina Hernandez-Boussard Is Shaping Inclusive Health Care

#Methods

Tina Hernandez-Boussard, PhD, exploring the intersections of technology and medicine in bioinformatics, as reflected through the lens of her research

Tina Hernandez-Boussard grew up in a small rural town, where higher education was uncommon. Despite an environment with limited opportunities, she soon discovered a unique passion: data. “Data was my ticket to a different world,” she recalls. Driven by curiosity and determination, Hernandez-Boussard pursued higher education with a focus on bioinformatics, an interdisciplinary field that combines biology, computer science, and data analysis to understand and analyze biological data. 

Fast-forward to today, Hernandez-Boussard, PhD, now serves as the associate dean of research at Stanford University and a professor of medicine. Her journey has been driven by a singular mission: to use data and technology to advance health equity and patient care.

Serving Vulnerable Populations with Data-Driven Insights

One of the most compelling aspects of Hernandez-Boussard’s work is her focus on using AI and data analytics to serve vulnerable patient populations, including those battling opioid addiction, cancer patients experiencing depression, and individuals struggling with mental health issues.

A significant part of her research delves into pain management and the use of opioids. When Hernandez-Boussard and her team started working on pain management and opioids, it was before the opioid epidemic had fully emerged. “Prior to the epidemic, the focus was on ensuring that no one had to deal with pain, leading to a significant promotion of opioid prescriptions,” she says. 

As the opioid crisis began to unfold in 2010, it became clear that the system had flaws. “We saw that prescriptions for opioids were really designated by system protocol, not personalized care,” she says. This approach didn’t account for previous opioid addiction, other medications the patient might be taking, or their individual pain management needs. Consequently, the lack of personalized medicine contributed to inadequate and sometimes harmful patient care.

Hernandez-Boussard and her team knew they had to take action. By analyzing large datasets, her team identified trends in opioid prescriptions and patient outcomes, allowing them to develop more precise pain management strategies. “We’ve identified features associated with high-risk patients, such as a history of addiction or concurrent medications,” she says. This information enables personalized pain management plans that minimize the risk of addiction. 

Similar data-driven methods are used to address the challenges faced by cancer patients experiencing depression. Hernandez-Boussard and her team have been studying depression after a cancer diagnosis. By applying machine learning, a branch of artificial intelligence (AI) that uses algorithms and statistical models to make data-based predictions, they have identified features associated with depression in these patients. One significant finding was the association between loneliness and depression following a cancer diagnosis. “If we can identify recent losses in a patient’s life, like a divorce or the death of a loved one, we can better predict and manage their risk of depression,” explains Hernandez-Boussard. 

Integrating data from a variety of sources, her team crafts comprehensive profiles of patients. This holistic approach allows for targeted interventions that address not only the clinical symptoms of depression but also the social and emotional factors at play. For example, if a patient is flagged for significant loneliness following a divorce, the healthcare team can proactively connect them with support groups, counseling services, or community resources. This not only helps to mitigate their risk of depression but fosters a more supportive and responsive care environment.

"

“We are at the brink of a digital revolution that is going to be equivalent to, if not bigger than, the Industrial Revolution. AI is here. It’s here to stay. We’re using it. It’s being integrated. Understanding how to embrace that is going to be the future.”

– Tina Hernandez-Boussard, PhD

An artistic portrayal of Tina Hernandez-Boussard, PhD, symbolizing the pursuit of health equity through data science and artificial intelligence, as she works to bridge gaps in healthcare outcomes – Courtesy of DALL-E.

Advancing Mental Health Care

Hernandez-Boussard also recognizes the transformative potential of AI in mental health care, especially in identifying and supporting individuals at risk of severe mental health issues. With mental health concerns escalating at an alarming rate, AI offers innovative solutions for early intervention.

Utilizing natural language processing, which focuses on the interaction between computers and human language, Hernandez-Boussard’s team can analyze clinical notes and patient emails to detect language patterns indicative of depression. This capability allows for the identification of high-risk patients and the provision of timely support.

Moreover, Hernandez-Boussard underscores the potential of AI chatbots to bridge the gap during times when human professionals may not be available. “One of the most critical times for suicide risk is at 4 a.m.,” she observes. “During these hours, professionals aren’t available, and while hotlines might be, access can be challenging.” AI chatbots could provide immediate support and resources during these critical moments, offering a lifeline when it’s most needed.

Addressing Bias and Ensuring Equity

Acknowledging the significant influence of AI on health care, Hernandez-Boussard emphasizes the importance of addressing potential biases in these systems. “AI systems often reflect existing biases from historical data,” she says. This can worsen inequalities, especially for marginalized groups.

She stresses the need for diverse datasets to ensure that models represent the entire population. “When analyzing electronic health record (EHR) data, we include social determinants of health like access to food, transportation, and socioeconomic status. This helps us understand a patient’s broader context and its impact on their health.” 

Hernandez-Boussard emphasizes cultural humility in developing models from EHRs. “Patients express their feelings differently based on gender and cultural background. A model trained only on non-Hispanic white women won’t work well for other populations,” she says.

Ultimately, Hernandez-Boussard underscores the importance of developing models trained on diverse data. “Including data from various racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds helps avoid perpetuating biases and inequalities,” she states.

Ultimately, Hernandez-Boussard views the current moment in healthcare technology as a pivotal one. “We are at the brink of a digital revolution that is going to be equivalent to, if not bigger than, the Industrial Revolution,” she asserts. “AI is here. It’s here to stay. We’re using it. It’s being integrated. Understanding how to embrace that is going to be the future.”

Preparing for the Next Pandemic

Preparing for the Next Pandemic

#Interventions

Infectious diseases expert David Relman, MD, took a sabbatical in 2024 to serve as a senior adviser to the Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy.

The federal government has two primary strategies for facing potential pandemics: prevent them from happening and prepare to respond when an outbreak does occur. Often, the government is doing both at once. It’s a balancing act, and the White House’s Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy (OPPR) is its center. 

In 2024, infectious diseases expert David Relman, MD, the Thomas C. and Joan M. Merigan Professor in Medicine and professor of microbiology and immunology at Stanford, went on sabbatical to serve a six-month stint as a senior adviser to OPPR.

An Early Test of OPPR

OPPR was established by a bipartisan act of Congress in 2023 to advise the president and to drive interagency coordination and communication around preparedness and response to pandemics and biological threats. 

“We’re still here. Humans do have the means of making this place a better world. We just have to put our minds to it and commit to the hard work.”

– David Relman, MD

According to OPPR Director Paul Friedrichs, MD, in a speech at Boston University in March 2024, OPPR’s staff does not look like “typical government people.” There are career policy makers and people from the Pentagon in the mix, but there are also physicians and career scientists, like Relman. 

When Relman began working at OPPR in late April 2024, an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A (H5N1) was spreading in dairy cows in the United States. Humans come into close contact with dairy cows during the milking process, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported cases in humans exposed to infected cows.

The federal response to the H5N1 outbreak has included the Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the CDC, the National Institutes of Health, and other components of the Department of Health and Human Services. Resulting actions have included a USDA federal order that dictated livestock testing and reporting policies, USDA funding to identify and address cases of H5N1 in poultry and livestock, and an FDA program to test the commercial milk supply for the virus.

OPPR is deeply involved in the response to HPAI. In testimony to the Senate Appropriations Committee in May, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, credited OPPR for coordinating the response across agencies “at the highest level.”

"

Harmonizing the Interagency Response

Relman and his colleagues attend many meetings each day with the various parties involved. They discuss ongoing responses and long-term planning. They try to find common ground, establish priorities, and ensure that good policies result. At the very least, Relman says, they work to see that “there aren’t disparate and contradictory actions.”

The H5N1 outbreak embodies the balancing act of government. As multiple institutions respond in harmony to stop the spread of H5N1 in livestock and humans, they must also build a long-term plan. 

Long-term planning includes asking educated what-if questions. Viruses mutate. Pandemic preparedness means anticipating possible mutations and developing countermeasures, such as tests, antivirals, and vaccines.

Relman’s task at OPPR is to provide the perspective of a career scientist and expert in infectious diseases and biological risk. In particular, he is personally most interested in the problem of anticipating future events, such as how viruses might evolve or how well-intentioned science might lead to consequential biological risk.

A Seasoned Expert in Advising the Government

Relman is no stranger to advising the U.S. government on future biological threats. He has an enduring commitment to national service. “I’ve always felt that’s just an important component of being a responsible scientist,” he says. 

For more than two decades, that commitment has included serving on the Defense Science Board for the Department of Defense and as an inaugural member of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity. He is also a member of the National Academy of Medicine, part of the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, which advises the U.S. government on pressing matters of health and science. Relman’s work for the National Academies in general has been substantial, including influential work in the realms of laboratory science, international security, and future biological threats. 

Relman chaired a committee at the National Academies that provided advice to the U.S. State Department and co-chaired a panel for the U.S. intelligence community on Havana syndrome, a set of neurological symptoms and findings that was first reported in 2016 in U.S. government personnel based at the U.S. Embassy in Cuba. The origin of Havana syndrome and its national security implications continue to be a subject of debate, with Relman a prominent voice

“It’s rare for professors with strong academic research portfolios to also have a practical sense of issues that are important to public policy,” says RAND Corporation President and CEO Jason Matheny, who has worked with Relman in previous roles related to policy, including serving together on the National Academies’ Intelligence Community Studies Board. 

“I think there’s only a handful of people in this category of people who are as widely respected in the scientific community who spend a significant portion of their waking hours thinking about national security and public policy,” Matheny says. “Truly, I can only think of a few people who have committed as much as David has to these topics.”

A Different Kind of Sabbatical

Relman’s work in OPPR is his first time advising from within the government. 

“I had never taken a sabbatical,” he says. “This seemed like a fun, interesting, and unusually important opportunity, even though I knew it would not be a relaxing six months. Which, it turns out, it isn’t.”  

There is an urgency to OPPR’s work. Most people agree that it is not a question of if, but when the next pandemic will arise and under what circumstances. 

But ultimately, he says, despite the challenges facing OPPR and humanity more broadly, “we’re still here. Humans do have the means of making this place a better world. We just have to put our minds to it and commit to the hard work.” 

“Accountability and delivering for the American public is a very palpable thing here,” Relman says. “It adds to the pressure to get things done.”

Relman has advised the U.S. government on biological threats, in various capacities, for over two decades.

Pioneering Partnerships: Stanford and Sequoia Enhance Patient Care with New Hospital-Within-a-Hospital

Pioneering Partnerships: Stanford and Sequoia Enhance Patient Care with New Hospital-Within-a-Hospital

#Partnerships

Staff at the new unit’s ribbon-cutting were excited to launch a hospital-within-a-hospital, a new frontier for patient care at Stanford Hospital.

While the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic is behind us, difficult memories remain. Healthcare providers worked herculean hours to treat the influx of patients, and many contracted the virus themselves. Countless people delayed their routine health care. These factors laid the groundwork for today’s post-pandemic shortages of hospital staffing along with more and sicker patients needing emergency care. 

While Stanford Hospital has maintained its staffing levels, closures of clinical programs throughout the region due to medical personnel shortages have meant more people coming to Stanford Hospital’s Emergency Department. Even with the opening of an 824,000-square-foot, state-of-the-art hospital in 2019, which expanded inpatient capacity to more than 600 beds, Stanford had been struggling to keep up with the needs of the community. 

The Department of Medicine, in conjunction with Stanford Health Care’s Business Development team, came up with a novel solution to its inpatient bed shortage: a partnership with Dignity Health Sequoia Hospital to establish a new frontier of care for Stanford patients through a “hospital-within-a-hospital.”

A Win-Win for Both Hospitals

“We learned that Sequoia Hospital had not been at full capacity and, like Stanford, is patient-centric, well-run, and has good accommodations. Stanford Health Care decided to approach them to see if we could lease a 24-bed unit,” says Division of Hospital Medicine Chief Neera Ahuja, MD, who specializes in building new clinical programs. Another enticement was Sequoia Hospital’s Redwood City location, just a few miles up the road from the Stanford campus.

“A hospital-within-a-hospital is a new model of care for the Department of Medicine,” notes Thomas Lew, MD, clinical assistant professor of medicine and medical director of the Stanford Sequoia unit. “Instead of acquiring a hospital or building from scratch, we realized we could partner with another hospital system that’s not at capacity. Sequoia had a brand-new ward that had only been used briefly during the pandemic,” he adds.

After a year of discussion, planning, and setup, the Stanford Health Care (SHC) Patient Care Unit at Dignity Sequoia Hospital opened May 8, 2024.

"

“A hospital-within-a-hospital is a new model of care for the Department of Medicine. Instead of acquiring a hospital or building from scratch, we realized we could partner with another hospital system that’s not at capacity. Sequoia had a brand-new ward that had only been used briefly during the pandemic.”

– Thomas Lew, MD

Designed for a Positive Patient Experience

While not every patient who goes to the emergency room needs to be admitted to the hospital, those who come to the Stanford Emergency Department and require inpatient care for certain types of issues now don’t have to wait for a hospital bed. Instead, they can be quickly transported to the Stanford Health Care Patient Care Unit at Sequoia via ambulance.

Notes Ahuja, who oversaw the clinical buildout of the unit, “We are aiming for a seamless experience for our patients. The unit is staffed by Department of Medicine hospitalists, Stanford Health Care nurses, and other key personnel. Patients have either a private room or a large, shared room that looks just like one they’d have at Stanford Hospital.” The Stanford Health Care Patient Care Unit at Sequoia has 12 private rooms and six shared rooms, all more spacious than comparable rooms at the Stanford campus.

“An additional benefit is that this unit opens up beds on the Stanford campus for patients with more complex and highly specialized conditions who could only get their care at Stanford Hospital,” Ahuja explains.

As medical director of the new unit, Lew designed the new workflow for the offsite location, hired a team of on-site hospitalists, and was the first physician to see patients there. He continues to oversee clinical care to ensure that patients receive Stanford-level quality. 

A Novel Approach to Specialty Care

The unit draws from a roster of Department of Medicine specialists from endocrinology, nephrology, infectious diseases, and cardiovascular medicine, who are available to consult with patients virtually via a wall-mounted large-screen TV and a camera. 

“We learned during COVID that there are times when virtual interaction is as good as or better than in-person interaction,” says Christopher Sharp, MD, chief medical informatics officer, whose team supported the integration of digital technology into the Sequoia unit. “This is an exciting model that allows us to extend specialty care outside of the Stanford campus by ‘beaming in’ specialists.”

Ron Li, MD, medical informatics director for digital health, designed the virtual consult workflow and helped specialty clinicians learn how to best use the technology to care for patients. As a board-certified informaticist, Li specializes in using technology to improve the care of hospitalized patients.

Stanford has previously used the virtual consult model to bring high-quality specialty care to affiliate hospitals and clinics – in some cases expanding access to specialty care 24/7. Telehealth has proved to be reliable and agreeable to patients. “The expertise and care we bring to patients is at the core of our mission,” says Sharp, “and by being digitally driven, we’re able to scale the reach of this expertise across Stanford Health Care sites.” 

Collaboration Is Key

Ultimately, says Lew, “we found a great partner in Sequoia Hospital – a fantastic community hospital – and everyone has been exceedingly kind and welcoming.” He also appreciated the extensive input from Department of Medicine physicians to help make this new frontier of a hospital-within-a-hospital a reality. “This huge collaboration was an innovative process for the Department of Medicine,” he says, “and hopefully just the start for this new model of care.”

Rooms in the Stanford Health Care Patient Care Unit at Dignity Sequoia Hospital are spacious and equipped with cutting-edge technology.

Pandemic Inspires Outside-the-Box Thinking

This wasn’t the first time the Department of Medicine used an unconventional approach to address an increase in patients caused by the pandemic. In 2020, the department formed surge teams, an all-hands-on-deck way to care for waves of COVID-19 patients. Doctors from a variety of specialties, along with residents and faculty, volunteered for shifts working as hospitalists or internal medicine physicians to treat the overflow of patients.

Specialty Care Services Available Through Virtual Consults

Department of Medicine hospitalists partner with physicians from the most-needed specialty care services for non-complex conditions, enabled through a cutting-edge teleconferencing system.

  • Endocrinology, Gerontology & Metabolism
  • Nephrology
  • Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Medicine

Pioneering New CLL Treatments for All: Bita Fakhri’s Innovative Approach

Pioneering New CLL Treatments for All: Bita Fakhri’s Innovative Approach

#Methods

Bita Fakhri, MD, MPH

In the last decade, nearly everything about how clinicians treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has changed. The most common leukemia in adults, CLL is a cancer of blood-forming cells in the bone marrow. For many years, the disease was treated with the same chemotherapies as other cancers, which indiscriminately kill all quickly growing cells in the body. But recently, scientists developed more targeted ways of treating CLL by attacking specific proteins that CLL cells rely on or by using the power of the immune system. These drugs have proved to be more effective – and have a better side effect profile – than conventional chemotherapies. 

During the early years of her career, Assistant Professor of Hematology Bita Fakhri, MD, MPH, was involved in many of the seminal clinical trials showing just how effective the new generation of drugs was. She watched experimental drugs become commercially available options to extend the duration and quality of patients’ lives. 

“The advances in this field over the last 10 years have been truly mind-blowing,” says Fakhri. “Seeing the success of these drugs, and just how dynamic the field has been, made me want to keep working on CLL.”

Broad Clinical Trial Options

In 2022, Fakhri became the director of the CLL clinical trial portfolio at Stanford after the passing of Steven Coutre, MD, who had established the clinical research program in the Division of Hematology. Since joining, she has launched five new clinical trials for patients with CLL. She is also hard at work to open clinical trials benefiting patients with Richter’s transformation – a condition in which CLL transforms to a more aggressive lymphoma with currently very poor outcomes. Those trials, she says, range from testing new front-line options for patients who have new CLL diagnoses to comparing treatments for people whose recurrent cancers are not responding to newer targeted agents in the field.

“One of my priorities at Stanford is making sure that we always have trials in both of these settings,” says Fakhri. “Despite all the advances in CLL, there are still a subset of patients with high-risk features that need new treatment options, and we want to meet their needs.”

About 88% of patients newly diagnosed with CLL will survive for at least five years, according to the latest data from the National Cancer Institute. That represents a large increase from the 70% to 75% five-year survival rate in the 1990s and early 2000s. But patients who have recurrence of their cancer, even years later, often fare less well – that is one of the populations Fakhri hopes to help with new clinical trials.

Fakhri adds that the most effective CLL drugs have come out of a detailed molecular understanding of how CLL impacts cells, and this kind of basic research must continue. To that end, she is collaborating with Stanford scientists including Sydney Lu, MD, PhD, who studies the underlying biology of CLL and other cancers. Lu and Fakhri are studying the implications of a gene mutation, known as SF3B1, that is found in about one in 10 CLL cancers and is associated with worse outcomes for patients. If they can understand the molecular consequences of SF3B1, Fakhri says, they may be able to develop new drugs to counteract the mutation or develop a better understanding of the clinical behavior and response to different therapies in patients harboring the SF3B1 mutation.

"

“I’m not involved in DEI efforts because I think it’s a trendy topic. This is the right thing to do, morally, ethically, and scientifically. If we don’t have a diverse patient population in our studies, then we don’t know if our results are applicable to all our patients.”

– Bita Fakhri, MD, MPH

Equal Access for All

Among the many clinical trials that Fakhri is involved in, one thing ties them all together: an emphasis on equity. As the head of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in the Division of Hematology, Fakhri is passionate about making sure that patients of all backgrounds, identities, and socioeconomic statuses are represented in her research. 

“I’m not involved in DEI efforts because I think it’s a trendy topic,” says Fakhri. “This is the right thing to do, morally, ethically, and scientifically. If we don’t have a diverse patient population in our studies, then we don’t know if our results are applicable to all our patients.”

As more CLL treatments emerge, and each patient’s path to remission becomes more personalized, it is especially important to include a diverse set of patients in every clinical trial. Ultimately, clinicians’ decisions about which drugs will work best for a particular patient may be based on not only clinical data but demographic information as well – from race and ethnicity to gender and education. 

“What I want is to create the machinery that eases enrollment in clinical trials and makes access to these trials feasible for everyone, not only for the most privileged patients,” says Fakhri. 

Fakhri and her colleagues are currently analyzing data on the diversity of Stanford clinical trials in hematology over the last decade to identify which patients are underrepresented. This information, she says, will help guide future clinical trial recruitment efforts.  

“The beauty of medicine is that we are all physiologically different,” says Fakhri. “We need that diversity captured in our trials.”