SCCR: The Engine of Innovation

The SCCR team marks 10 years of progress — bringing together staff, faculty, and collaborators dedicated to driving clinical research forward.

SCCR: The Engine of Innovation

SCCR’s rigorous scientific investigations are powered by efficient operational processes and a dedicated, highly trained team of clinical research professionals. The center supports a wide range of therapeutic areas and modalities, including drugs, devices, digital health, and behavioral interventions. By combining the deep expertise of faculty investigators with the strength of its operations staff, SCCR continues to drive innovation and turn bold research ideas into real-world impact.

Founded in 2014 with a clear mission to advance impactful clinical research through education and high-quality operations, SCCR has grown into one of the nation’s most respected Academic Research Organizations. Today, it serves as the epicenter of clinical research operations at Stanford University, offering end-to-end research capabilities — from study design to publication.

Behind every headline-grabbing scientific discovery, there’s a powerful engine making it all happen — designing trials, coordinating data, managing compliance, and ensuring that everything runs as it should. At Stanford Medicine, that engine is the Stanford Center for Clinical Research (SCCR).

Achievements

SCCR teams have completed over 250 projects in the past 10 years. These have included observational registries, implementation science projects, population health programs, and randomized trials. Below is an example of selected programs that are ongoing or completed.

 

Cellular Immune Tolerance Program

The Cellular Immune Tolerance (CIT) program, led by Everett Meyer, MD, PhD, and Stephan Busque, MD, is working to make cell therapy a reality for non-cancer patients. So far, they’ve launched 16 clinical trials — including 8 that they designed and got approved by the FDA. SCCR plays a key role by providing the research support needed to make these studies possible.

Innovative Medicines Accelerator / Chemistry, Engineering and Medicine for Human Health

Researchers from Stanford’s chemistry and medicine teams are working together with liver and digestive health experts to study how the bacteria in our gut affect the immune system. Led by Stephan Rogalla, MD, PhD, Alice Bertaina MD, PhD, Sean Spencer, MD, PhD, Natalie Torok, MD, Nielsen Fernandez-Becker, MD, PhD, and Konstantina Stankovic, MD, PhD, the team is exploring how these gut microbes influence liver and digestive diseases.

Multi-Site Oncology

SCCR has advanced multi-site oncology research through pivotal trials like TrioMBM, led by Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, which investigates a novel immunotherapy for melanoma brain metastases. SCCR also serves as the Clinical Coordinating Center for the Bright Pink Preventive Risk Outreach and Cascade Testing (PROACT) Program, in partnership with the University of Michigan. Funded by Bright Pink, the program promotes breast and ovarian cancer prevention through digital tools that expand education and access to genetic testing.

Project Baseline Health Study

The Project Baseline Health Study is a nationwide effort to better understand what keeps us healthy and what leads to disease. Led at Stanford by Kenneth Mahaffey, MD, and the late Sam Gambhir, MD, PhD, the study followed over 2,500 people—tracking everything from activity and sleep to doctor visits over several years.

Facing the Future

Ten years in, SCCR isn’t slowing down. A new strategic plan is guiding the center toward deeper digital integration, stronger partnerships, and even more inclusive research. Today, SCCR is powered by over 200 staff, faculty, and data science collaborators, and its work is amplified through 28 university partnerships — a network that continues to grow with each passing year. Their vision for the future includes expanded use of wearable technology, greater participant engagement through mobile platforms, and continued investment in education and training.

 

Related Spotlights

The Smoking Cessation Program for Veterans That Doesn’t Quit

The Smoking Cessation Program for Veterans That Doesn’t Quit

Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, and veterans face some of the toughest barriers to quitting. TeleQuit is built to overcome those barriers – offering remote care, mailed medications, and continuous support to help veterans at every stage of their quit journey. 

In this conversation, program lead Ware Kuschner, MD, Stanford School of Medicine professor of pulmonary, allergy and critical care medicine and Medical Director of the TeleQuit Smoking Cessation Program for Veterans at the Veterans Health Administration; Angela Malenfant, nurse practitioner; and Sebnem Guvenc-Tuncturk, MD, program manager of the TeleQuit Smoking Cessation Program, explain how the model works and why this kind of care is essential.

Ware Kuschner, MD, director of TeleQuit and professor at the Stanford School of Medicine, stands outside the VA Palo Alto Health Care System, where he leads the national effort to support veterans in quitting tobacco.

Click image to expand.

Q: Why is it important to continue to focus on smoking cessation?      

Ware Kuschner: Treating nicotine addiction doesn’t have the wonder and awe of organ transplantation. But in 2025, smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the United States. We’ve got to keep at it.

Q: Why are veterans an important population to serve?

Angela Malenfant: A lot of tobacco use starts during military service. Many say, “I was handed my first pack of cigarettes when I was 21.” It’s tied to stress, downtime, and deployment. We also see higher rates of mental health disorders in veterans, which means heavier dependence.

Q: What does TeleQuit do differently?

Sebnem Guvenc-Tuncturk: Telehealth allows us to reach so many veterans no matter where they are located. A huge differentiator is that we follow up. A lot of health systems don’t. We reach out the day after the patient’s VA doctor sends us a referral, and if we can’t reach someone, we try again at different times, leaving voicemails – everything. At one month and six months, we follow up again, even if they have never enrolled. That kind of persistence matters.

Kuschner: Once they’re referred, their primary call provider is done. We handle the rest: education, counseling, medication, and follow-up. It’s streamlined for both the veterans and their care team.

Q: How are you adapting to today’s challenges?

Malenfant: We’re seeing more nicotine pouches and e-cigarettes, especially with younger vets. It’s not just cigarettes anymore, and for that reason there’s no one-size-fits-all approach.

Guvenc-Tuncturk: We’ve started a proactive outreach pilot. We contact veterans who haven’t been referred but show signs of tobacco use in their records, especially those with mental health needs. Even if they’re not ready to quit, we use motivational interviewing and offer them nicotine gum or lozenges. It’s a small step that can lead to real change.

Q: What keeps you going?

Kuschner: The easy cases have already quit. We’re helping the tough ones now. And when they succeed – even if we can’t point to the heart attack or stroke they avoided – we know we’ve made a difference.

  Save as PDF

Related Spotlights

The Stanford Advantage

The Stanford Advantage

Sulaiman Somani Describes Research Opportunities in Residency and More

Young physicians with the drive to be true leaders and innovators in their fields need look no further than the Stanford Internal Medicine (IM) Residency program. Where else can residents as early as their second year collaborate with engineers and computer scientists on research projects that may well change the face of medicine?

Sulaiman Somani, MD, first chief resident in IM, then fellow in cardiovascular diseases at Stanford, chats about what brought him to Stanford, what makes Stanford’s residency program stand out, and his role as a mentor for his fellow residents.

Somani works alongside Associate Program Director of IM Residency Angela Rogers, MD, to develop the curriculum for residents involved in research and provide mentorship. “A key focus of my time as a chief resident has been to continue supporting research at the resident level,” said Somani, “and find ways of making myself, as someone who understands the Stanford research ecosystem and environment, and Angela Rogers more accessible to the residents.” From scheduling formal meetings to more casual dinner events, he ensures that the “trains are running in terms of people signing up for research, getting answers, and finding the right mentors.”

Formerly chief resident in Internal Medicine (IM), Sulaiman Somani, MD, is currently a fellow in cardiovascular diseases at Stanford.

The Stanford Difference: Supporting Research

“The IM program that we have here at Stanford is one of the best in the country, and one of our core pillars is resident research,” says Somani. “Having experience doing research in residency gives you a deeper, more in-depth understanding of your area of focus and sets you up for a future career track as a physician-scientist, a physician-engineer, or physician-researcher.”

Second- and third-year Stanford residents are allotted a full month for every year of training to dedicate to research, under the guidance of a mentor. These research efforts are shared and lauded at the annual Residency Research Symposium, where Stanford residents present posters of their scholarly works and research to the Department of Medicine chair, vice chair, program directors, faculty, fellows, residents, medical students, visitors, and staff.

“But a really innovative and unique part about coming to Stanford is access to mentors across other schools, like the School of Business and Computer Science. Residents often partner with faculty in these different departments to perform tremendous multidisciplinary research.” – Sulaiman Somani, MD

“Our residents often end up publishing around 50 to 60 manuscripts in a given year,” says Somani. Stanford residents also obtain research grants during residency, which are virtually “unheard of” outside Stanford. “I think that’s all a testament to how incredible the research ecosystem is for residents at Stanford.” Somani himself was awarded a $25,000 grant from the Center for Digital Health for a project that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to better understand nonprescription of oral anticoagulant therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation.

The residency program also allows residents to partake in research-intensive programs at the university. One example is the Intensive Course in Clinical Research, a one-week intensive immersion course to help residents, fellows, and junior faculty learn more about research study design and performance.

“Our residents often end up publishing around 50 to 60 manuscripts in a given year… I think that’s all a testament to how incredible the research ecosystem is for residents at Stanford.” – Sulaiman Somani, MD

The Stanford Difference: A Multidisciplinary Pool of Mentors

“There are a lot of incredible faculty mentors at the hospital that residents can work with,” says Somani. “But a really innovative and unique part about coming to Stanford is access to mentors across other schools, like the School of Business and Computer Science. Residents often partner with faculty in these different departments to perform tremendous multidisciplinary research.” For instance, Somani’s latest work on anticoagulation therapy was a collaboration with the Department of Biomedical Data Science and Technology and Digital Solutions at Stanford.

Stanford has worked hard to develop an innovative residency program that offers residents unique collaborative opportunities so that they can graduate already having begun their journey as leaders and visionaries in medicine and related fields. Somani’s experience shows that this hard work is paying off.

Landing at Stanford

As one of the first generation in his family to go to university, Sulaiman Somani obtained an undergraduate degree in chemical and biomolecular engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and a medical degree from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York. While a medical student, he became fascinated with the potential for AI to advance medicine, co-founding a startup that 3D-printed patient-personalized hip replacement implants developed from a patient’s CT scan. Upon returning to medical school, he developed a deep learning model to predict different disease diagnostics using electrocardiogram output. 

Somani chose Stanford for his IM residency because of the unique research opportunities it offered. Working under Fatima Rodriguez, MD, he used natural language processing and large language models to better understand attitudes and beliefs about key concepts in cardiology, as expressed on social media. This research led to several publications, including a piece titled “Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Is It Ready for Prime Time?,” published in 2024 in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, as well as a Young Investigator Award in Outcomes Research from the American College of Cardiology.

  Save as PDF

Related Spotlights

Limited Sobriety Pathway Saves the Lives of Those With Little Hope

Limited Sobriety Pathway Saves the Lives of Those With Little Hope

One Patient Finds a Path to Giving Back

Getting a new liver through Limited Sobriety Pathway gave Jak Cooper a new lease on life. 

Jak Cooper, a liver transplant recipient, describes the origins of her cirrhosis: “I drank heavily growing up. With difficult life events like deaths and my husband being diagnosed with cancer, I found myself without the life skills I needed to deal with those things, and I drank. Two and a half years ago, I was diagnosed with cirrhosis and was very sick.”

Cooper received her diagnosis at El Camino Hospital, where she was treated over a several-month period for edema, jaundice, and hepatic encephalopathy, a brain dysfunction that occurs in people with advanced liver disease. Finally it became clear that she needed a new liver, and the community hospital began a referral process for transplant evaluation.

“I was so sick at this point, I didn’t have the luxury of time,” she says. “I was told that without a transplant, I had a more than 50% chance of dying within three months.”

Two hospitals declined to consider Cooper for a transplant because she hadn’t been six months sober. Then Cooper was referred to Stanford, where she was taken by ambulance, underwent an expedited evaluation, and was deemed eligible for Limited Sobriety Pathway. Once a liver match was found, she underwent the transplant. “This was the beginning of a whole lovely, crazy journey,” she says.

A New Approach to Transplantation Eligibility

Before Limited Sobriety Pathway was established, patients with acute liver disease from alcohol use or severe alcohol-induced hepatitis had to demonstrate six months of sobriety before being eligible for a liver transplant. About 70% of patients died in the interim. In 2017, Aparna Goel, MD, a general and transplant hepatologist and clinical associate professor of gastroenterology and hepatology, established Limited Sobriety Pathway to remove that arbitrary timeframe. “We found that six months of sobriety was not a magic number for transplant or sobriety success, and we were doing a disservice to a group of patients who were very ill,” she explains.

While Cooper didn’t need six months of sobriety, she did have to demonstrate that she was a good transplant candidate. Says Goel, “We look for candidates who have insight into their addiction and show a willingness to participate in our relapse prevention program.”

Because Cooper had ceased drinking the day she received her cirrhosis diagnosis and immediately began participating in a 12-step program, she was accepted for a transplant. She also had to sign a contract to commit to the postoperative Intensive Outpatient Program. “Being given a body part of somebody’s loved one is not something you do lightly, and it was a commitment I was more than willing to make,” she says.

“They set you up for success straight out of the gate. With all of these different disciplines working together, they put this scaffolding around you to hold you up so you can stay sober, fit, and healthy.” – Jak Cooper

A Model That Sets Up Patients for Success

Several elements beyond the eligibility period distinguish Limited Sobriety Pathway.  Explains Allison Kwong, MD, a hepatologist and assistant professor of gastroenterology and hepatology, “We have systems in place to be successful. We begin with a comprehensive psychosocial assessment to determine whether the patient is likely to take care of a new liver successfully. And we have long-term monitoring after the transplant to help patients stay on track with their sobriety.”

Helping patients navigate the pathway is a robust, multidisciplinary team, representing hepatology, addiction medicine, psychiatry, social work, substance use navigation, and transplant surgery. This team works on two fronts: managing the patient’s addiction and managing liver disease.

Cooper, who celebrated two and a half years of sobriety last August, credits the “compassionate and passionate” Limited Sobriety Pathway team for her second chance at life. “They set you up for success straight out of the gate. With all of these different disciplines working together, they put this scaffolding around you to hold you up so you can stay sober, fit, and healthy,” she says.

Ongoing resources are crucial because “the underlying cause doesn’t go away after a transplant,” says Cooper. “I am still an alcoholic in recovery, and my illness needs continuing management – just as a person with diabetes needs to continue to take insulin. Under this program, I have access to these resources for as long as I need them.”

Adds Goel, “Our patients do incredibly well – better than what we see in the literature for graft survival and return to alcohol use. And they know that at any time going forward they have people to turn to for support if they need it.”

Cooper concurs, crediting substance use navigator Linda Jarit and social worker Amanda Norwood for support following her recovery. “We have one-on-one checkups and meet in a group to talk about how to deal with life as it happens. They are my cheerleaders – they are rooting for me and want the very best for me,” she says.

Click image to expand.

By the Numbers
108 patients have received transplants through Limited Sobriety Pathway, with a 98% survival rate.

Giving Back as a Way of Giving Thanks

Following her lifesaving liver transplant, Jak Cooper’s commitment went beyond staying sober – she also wanted to give back to others with alcohol use disorder.

In her first year posttransplant, Cooper worked with the nonprofit organization Sober Livers to educate the public about alcoholism and liver disease. “There’s still a stigma related to liver transplants for people with alcohol use disorder, and I wanted to help lessen that,” she explains.

Cooper has also spoken with other patients at Stanford Hospital who recently had a liver transplant and wanted to talk to someone with firsthand knowledge. These experiences inspired her to become state certified as a peer support specialist and work with Addiction Inpatient Medicine patients. Says Cooper, “I met with my assigned peer support specialist Alicia Ludlow when I was in the hospital. I felt that she understood what it’s like to be scared and trying to find your way out of addiction. Her humanity and humor were so impactful that I decided I wanted to serve that role for others.”

  Save as PDF

Related Spotlights

Shots on Goal

Shots on Goal

What Gives Bryant Lin Hope

Bryant Lin, MD, clinical professor of primary care and population health, received a diagnosis of stage IV lung cancer despite never having smoked.

The life of a physician in academic medicine requires drawing on a well of hope. Hope that treatments will be effective and patients will beat tough odds. Hope that new centers and programs will succeed. Hope that grant applications will receive funding and research findings will be meaningful. 

When clinical professor of primary care and population health Bryant Lin, MD, received a diagnosis of stage IV lung cancer, despite never having smoked, hope took on new meaning. His cancer is not curable. The path forward is not knowable. But cancer has not dented his hope for the future. 

Lin’s story has been widely covered in the media, including profiles in Stanford Magazine, CBS News, the San Francisco Chronicle, and The New York Times. The general narrative arc is this: Lin had a lingering cough that he first thought was caused by allergies. When he asked his primary care physician at Stanford to take a look, Lin set in motion a series of exams and tests that revealed he had non-small cell lung cancer with metastases across his body, including in his lymph nodes, bones, and brain. Lin began treatment, which was effective in mitigating but not eliminating the cancer. He continued his work treating patients and co-directing CARE, the Center for Asian Health Research and Education. 

“Hope and fear are linked together… They are the ends of the spectrum. My fear is lung cancer screening in nonsmokers will never get on any guidelines, because there’s not attention to it.” – Bryant Lin, MD

He also developed and taught a new class at Stanford, MED 275, A Doctor’s Journey With Lung Cancer. Over the 10-week course, Lin invited experts to present on topics ranging from diagnosis – for which his own primary care physician joined – to precision oncology and cancer epidemiology. He also shared his firsthand experiences with chemotherapy. One of his hopes for the class was to show that medicine is really about people. All the latest science and all the greatest technologies fundamentally serve the most human needs. 

Lin’s own very human experience with lung cancer involves a mutation in the gene that codes for a protein called the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Part of the treatment regimen includes taking inhibitors that block the EGFR protein’s activity and, in doing so, stop the cancer’s progression. However, the drug he is taking now, osimertinib, is unlikely to work indefinitely. His cancer will likely develop resistance to osimertinib. That much, his physicians can predict. The when is not certain.

One of Lin’s biggest goals is to see the younger of his two sons graduate from high school. His son started eighth grade this fall. 

“That’s where the hope part comes in,” he says.

Hope, Statistics, and Individual Outcomes

It’s easy to talk about and dwell on survival rate statistics and numbers, Lin says, especially as a physician. “Historic numbers for stage IV lung cancer are about 10% over five years. If you hear that, you can take it two ways. You can say, ‘Geez, that’s horrible, it’s a death sentence.’ Or you can take it with hope, which is, ‘Well, one out of 10 people do survive at five years.’”

The statistics should be improving, Lin says, after recent advancements in lung cancer drugs. But he tries not to focus on the numbers. “We in medicine apply population health statistics to individuals,” he says. “But who is the average individual? Nobody is the average individual. Of course, you always hope to exceed that average. But you could also be on the other side, where you’re far worse.” 

Lin leans on advice he received from a colleague of a medical school classmate who also has EGFR lung cancer. “He said this great thing: ‘You only have to live long enough until the next treatment comes out.’” 

There are no numbers around a goal like surviving until the next effective drug emerges. What there is, Lin says, “is a lot of hope in those types of statements and those beliefs.” 

 After his diagnosis, Lin developed a class for undergraduate and medical students about his experience as a lung cancer patient.

Hope in Action

At the heart of Lin’s work now is an effort to increase the pipeline of lung cancer research and potential treatments, particularly for EGFR lung cancer. “I’ve been working so hard to figure out, how do I stimulate more development in my area so that I have more shots on goal?” he says. “If there are five new treatments coming up, there’s more likelihood that you’re going to respond to one of them.”

Some of that research is taking place at Stanford. Lin’s oncologist, professor of medicine Heather Wakelee, MD, along with her collaborator Joel Neal, MD, PhD, a professor of oncology, has run many clinical trials testing different therapeutic approaches to EGFR mutations. Some involve combining different kinds of inhibitors to block multiple pathways that contribute to the cancer’s growth. Others involve combining different classes of drugs, such as pairing chemotherapy with various types of inhibitors, including immunotherapy. 

Developing varied drugs and therapeutic approaches to combating EGFR mutations may improve the odds for Lin and others with EGFR lung cancer. There are many ways a tumor can develop drug resistance. When – or if – a tumor becomes resistant to first-line drugs, such as osimertinib, Wakelee says, the next question to ask is why that resistance developed. The best second-line treatment may depend on the specific pathway driving the cancer’s growth. Having options – more shots on goal, to borrow Lin’s expression – increases the odds that something works.

Improving Screening and Clinical Decision-Making

In all forms of cancer, early detection leads to better outcomes. But lung cancer poses an unusual difficulty: It often doesn’t cause symptoms in its early stages, and it is usually diagnosed only after it has advanced. 

Natalie Lui, MD, assistant professor of cardiothoracic surgery, was one of Lin’s first guest speakers in the Med 275 class. In her presentation, she noted that there is a 90% five-year survival rate for stage I lung cancer, compared with less than 10% for stage IV. Screening and early detection are essential to saving lives. In 2025, CARE awarded a seed grant to Lui to fund her work on increasing the rates of lung cancer screening in Asian never-smokers. 

CARE also awarded a 2025 seed grant to Ruijiang Li, PhD, associate professor of radiation oncology, to fund his research on a vision language model that can look at pathology images and predict lung cancer treatment outcomes in Asian populations. While using artificial intelligence to examine images and aid physicians in cancer diagnoses has become increasingly common, using AI tools to predict prognosis and assist physicians in making clinical decisions is new. It may not be another shot on goal for Lin, but it may be for someone in his shoes in years to come. 

Lin co-founded and co-directs CARE, the Center for Asian Health Research and Education.

From Advocacy to Action

Lin’s schedule is busy. He hasn’t changed his life much since his diagnosis – he juggles family life, co-directs CARE, sees patients, and manages his own cancer. He does spend less time helping people start companies than he once did. (Lin himself is a successful entrepreneur and inventor with multiple U.S. patents for medical devices.) Instead, he has dedicated that time to lung cancer advocacy. He wants to help get more research and development funding, better education, and better guidelines around lung cancer. 

Relative to its prevalence and mortality, lung cancer is one of the most underfunded major cancers. Lung cancer causes about the same number of deaths as breast, prostate, and colon cancer combined in the U.S. but receives less than half the amount of federal research funding. And even though Asians, especially Asian women, have a well-documented higher risk of nonsmoker lung cancer, there are no U.S. guidelines for screening nonsmokers. Guidelines, specifically those issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, dictate what insurance covers. Without insurance coverage, many nonsmokers with higher lung cancer risks are unlikely to be screened. 

“Hope and fear are linked together,” Lin says. “They are the ends of the spectrum. My fear is lung cancer screening in nonsmokers will never get on any guidelines, because there’s not attention to it.” 

CARE is working on developing its own recommendations, recommendations that won’t have a direct impact on insurance coverage. They are, however, evidence-based and reflect what Lin shares with his own patients. “I was just tired of waiting for the guidelines,” he says. 

That’s where the other end of the spectrum, hope, comes back into play. Sharing his own guidelines – and sharing his story – might inspire people to be screened after speaking with their own doctor. 

An advanced-stage cancer diagnosis comes with fear. How can it not? But fear is only one end of the spectrum. There is also so much to hope for.

Learn more about the impact of CARE’s seed grant funding.

  Save as PDF

Related Spotlights

Welcoming Stanford Health Care Tri-Valley’s Inaugural Family Medicine Residents

Welcoming Stanford Health Care Tri-Valley’s Inaugural Family Medicine Residents

Stanford Health Care Tri-Valley proudly welcomes its first class of Family Medicine residents, an inspiring new chapter for the region. This inaugural cohort of eight physicians will not only train in a world-class academic program, but also serve the unique health needs of the Tri-Valley community.

Graduate Medical Education leaders emphasize that residency is more than training — it is a commitment to caring for patients using skill, compassion, and integrity. Program Coordinator Kimberly Young captures the excitement of this milestone: “We have worked so hard and so long on launching this new program, and to have the residents here makes us feel complete. There is a new energy here at Tri-Valley, like a spark.”

The inaugural class of Family Medicine residents at Stanford Health Care Tri-Valley began their training in June.

This spark will grow into a lasting impact. The residency program team aims to strengthen access to care locally, build enduring patient-physician relationships, and carry forward Stanford’s legacy of education, research, and clinical excellence. At the same time, it directly responds to the nation’s growing primary care physician shortage, preparing the next generation of family doctors to serve where they are needed most.

“In just a few months, I’ve already seen our residents grow and gain confidence,” Young shares. “I can’t wait to welcome future classes and watch our inaugural cohort become leaders and mentors for those who follow. More than anything, I want them to know they will always have a family here.”

  Save as PDF

Related Spotlights